Another blow to Congress in Punjab, will the party lose its position as Leader of Opposition in Rajya Sabha?
[ad_1]
After the crushing defeat in the assembly elections, the Congress is going to get another setback in Punjab. The party is going to suffer very soon even regarding Rajya Sabha seats. Because elections are to be held for 75 Rajya Sabha seats in the country by the end of this year, the schedule of 13 seats has also been released. In which 5 seats are also from Punjab.
Elections are going to be held for 13 seats of Rajya Sabha. For which notification is being issued today. Elections will be held on these 13 seats on March 31. Meanwhile, the tenure of eight members of Assam, Himachal Pradesh, Kerala, Nagaland and Tripura ends on April 2, while five seats are falling vacant in Punjab. Actually the tenure of 5 members will be completed on 9 April.
On the other hand, losing the Punjab elections will result in loss of Rajya Sabha seats to the Congress, it is obvious. Let us tell you that the Congress, which has been reduced to 18 out of 77 seats in Punjab, will also suffer loss of Rajya Sabha seats. Overall, by the end of this year, the Congress is also in danger of losing the position of Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha. Because the total seats of Congress can go below 25.
poor performance of congress in election
In fact, the results of the recently held assembly elections in five states have come. Congress was expecting a lot in the elections this time, but when the results came, Punjab also got out of hand. Total seats in Punjab 117, Congress got only 18. It is inevitable that in view of these seats, there was bound to be a head-football in the party. In view of the performance of the Congress in the elections, a meeting of those Congress leaders who have been demanding a change of leadership in the party for a long time and known as G-23 was also held at Ghulam Nabi Azad’s house in Delhi.
read this also:
‘Russia will not ask its European allies including America to lift the sanctions’, the minister said
,
[ad_2]
Source link
